88%
of basic web app breaches involved stolen credentials
Verizon DBIR 2025CyberFurl for SaaS
Your next deal does not die in the questionnaire. It dies in the exposed basics.
Buyers ask the same public-surface questions again and again: do you enforce DMARC, do you expose stale subdomains, do you have obvious admin paths, did your identities show up in breach dumps, and can your domain be spoofed? CyberFurl gives revenue teams a concrete external answer instead of a hand-wavy promise.
What CyberFurl covers
- 50+ external checks across six security suites.
- Five threat-intelligence tools inside the malware workflow.
- 24/7 monitoring today for DNS, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX, and subdomains.
- Scheduled rescans for infrastructure, variants, and threat sweeps.
Why this hurts
The numbers buyers and attackers already understand.
30%
of SMB breaches involved a third party
Verizon DBIR 2025 SMB Snapshot$16.6B
reported cybercrime losses in the United States
FBI IC3 2024Why generic scanners fail
Why generic scanners fail for SaaS.
Buyers care about what they can verify from the outside.
Questionnaires ask about process, but deals stall when the public evidence is messy: missing DMARC, leaking identities, stale subdomains, bad headers, or obvious admin paths. A generic scanner cannot turn those signals into a single buyer-ready story.
The problem is posture drift, not a one-day screenshot.
SaaS teams constantly add vendors, staging hosts, marketing domains, support mail flows, and customer-facing apps. If the scan does not revisit DNS, mail trust, and subdomains, the answer buyers saw last quarter stops being true.
Exposure spans more than the main app URL.
Attackers and technical buyers both inspect the whole footprint: MX, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, CT logs, forgotten portals, exposed services, and leaked identities tied to the brand. Tools that only score the homepage are not enough.
Ranked controls
The eight checks to prioritize first.
1
Validate SPF, DKIM, and DMARC so buyer security teams see that your domain cannot be trivially spoofed.
Email Intelligence2
Check MX redundancy, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, STARTTLS, and PTR so mail trust survives provider changes.
Email Intelligence3
Inventory public DNS records and nameserver delegation before launch leftovers confuse buyers and attackers alike.
DNS Intelligence4
Enumerate subdomains, certificate transparency entries, and variants to expose product sprawl and lookalike risk.
Domain Recon5
Run service detection, header checks, admin-panel discovery, and sensitive-path checks on internet-facing apps.
Infrastructure6
Check HIBP and credential-leak exposure before reused identities become the story buyers find first.
Threat Intelligence7
Use Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, malicious redirect, and exposed-path checks to spot public trust damage around your brand.
Threat Intelligence8
Monitor DNS, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX, and subdomains around releases; schedule rescans for headers, exposed services, and threat checks.
MonitoringBreach case study
One real incident, tied back to checks you can run.
Okta source-code breach, 2022
The Okta source-code incident reminded every SaaS buyer that trust can erode fast when exposed suppliers, identities, and public reassurances do not line up cleanly.
Root cause
Attackers compromised a third-party support environment and used that access to reach sensitive internal material tied to a widely trusted SaaS provider.
How CyberFurl maps to it
- Threat Intelligence helps surface breach exposure and compromised identities tied to the brand before buyer trust conversations start.
- Email Intelligence shows whether the public domain can be spoofed during customer-notification windows.
- Domain Recon and Infrastructure make it easier to prove what is actually exposed on the internet instead of hand-waving through a questionnaire.
Workflow
Scan, review, then keep the right layer watched.
01
Scan
Run the domain through CyberFurl and collect the DNS, email, threat, recon, infrastructure, and monitoring findings in one place.
02
Review report
Use the ranked findings to explain what attackers can see right now: spoofing gaps, exposed services, variants, known-malicious signals, and subdomain drift.
03
Schedule monitoring
Keep 24/7 monitoring on DNS, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX, and subdomains. Use scheduled rescans for infrastructure, threat, and variant reviews.
Sample report
What a SaaS report looks like on a known domain.
Sample domain: salesforce.com. The report keeps the output practical: public records, exposed services, mail trust, breach signals, variants, and the checks worth monitoring next.
- DNS and delegation snapshot with nameserver context.
- SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX, and transport posture in one block.
- Public services, headers, admin paths, and availability checks.
- Threat-intel, exposed-path, credential-leak, and redirect signals.
- Subdomains, CT entries, variants, and the monitoring-ready next step.
FAQ
Questions teams in this vertical usually ask first.
How is this different from a filled-out buyer questionnaire?
A questionnaire is a claim. This page shows the public evidence behind it: DNS posture, mail trust, exposed hosts, known-malicious signals, and breach exposure tied to the brand.
Can I share a CyberFurl report with a prospect during security review?
Yes. That is the point of this vertical page: give revenue teams a tight external answer they can hand to security buyers without inventing features that do not exist.
Does CyberFurl inspect my internal codebase?
No. It is an external posture platform. We show what buyers and attackers can observe from your domains, mail stack, internet-facing services, variants, and threat exposure.
Which checks stay under 24/7 monitoring?
DNS, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX, and subdomains. Everything else can be rescanned on a schedule so the public story stays fresh before a renewal or procurement review.
Why include breach exposure on a sales-focused page?
Because buyers ask about leaked identities, brand abuse, and public trust damage. If your org already appears in breach data, that should be handled before the prospect discovers it first.
What does the one-pager usually help a SaaS team answer fastest?
Whether the domain is spoofable, whether staging or abandoned subdomains exist, whether the app exposes obvious trust gaps, and whether public intelligence already points to compromise or abuse.
Keep digging
Useful next links for saas teams.
Final CTA
Get the SaaS External Attack Surface One-Pager for Buyers and see what attackers see first.
The fastest value is not another generic scan. It is one external report you can use to clean up spoofing room, stale assets, public service exposure, and the monitoring gaps that keep coming back.